<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Women&#8217;s Winter Sleeping Bags: REI Halo +10 &amp; Radiant +10</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.easternslopes.com/2010/02/07/womens-winter-sleeping-bags-rei-halo-radiant-10/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.easternslopes.com/2010/02/07/womens-winter-sleeping-bags-rei-halo-radiant-10/</link>
	<description>Eastern Snowsports &#38; Outdoor Activities -- The Facts You Need, The Opinions You Want</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 21:42:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Shedd</title>
		<link>http://www.easternslopes.com/2010/02/07/womens-winter-sleeping-bags-rei-halo-radiant-10/comment-page-1/#comment-3835</link>
		<dc:creator>David Shedd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://easternslopes.com/?p=3729#comment-3835</guid>
		<description>Danneaux, that&#039;s a great bit of research...thank you for passing it along!  I&#039;m sure other readers will find it useful.  Glad to hear you didn&#039;t get bothered by it being a &quot;women&#039;s&quot; bag; there&#039;s no such thing, just GOOD bags.  Thanks for reading, and for the feedback!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Danneaux, that&#8217;s a great bit of research&#8230;thank you for passing it along!  I&#8217;m sure other readers will find it useful.  Glad to hear you didn&#8217;t get bothered by it being a &#8220;women&#8217;s&#8221; bag; there&#8217;s no such thing, just GOOD bags.  Thanks for reading, and for the feedback!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danneaux</title>
		<link>http://www.easternslopes.com/2010/02/07/womens-winter-sleeping-bags-rei-halo-radiant-10/comment-page-1/#comment-3809</link>
		<dc:creator>Danneaux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 04:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://easternslopes.com/?p=3729#comment-3809</guid>
		<description>I appreciate your test, David, and it was a factor in my decision -- as a man -- to buy the REI women&#039;s long Halo +10 bag.  Why?  I am a solo adventure cyclist who takes trips through alpine passes to high-altitude &quot;cold&quot; deserts like the Great Basin during shoulder seasons, and it is common to experience temps in the single digits (F) at night and find it well over 100F by day&#039;s end.  Because of this, I needed a good, warm, cold-weather bag that was as light as possible and easy on the budget while packing reasonably small.  

The REI Women&#039;s Long Halo +10 fits my 5&#039;11&quot;, 165lb. frame perfectly, and I appreciate the extra warmth included in the hood, foot area, and chest compared to the men&#039;s version, which is not nearly as warm (the men&#039;s Halo +10 is EN 13537 rated at +12F for the men&#039;s lower limit, while the women&#039;s +10 is rated at +1F for men).  I am not overweight, so the 58&quot;/58&quot; shoulder/hip dimensions make for a tight column and practical performance fit I can heat without feeling pinched.  The men&#039;s was wider than I wanted to heat at the shoulders (59&quot;) and tighter in the hips (55&quot;), which inhibited easy turnover in the bag when wearing extra layers.  My bag may not be typical, but measures out repeatedly at 4.5&quot; of top loft and 3.75&quot; of bottom loft after sitting for an hour after it has been removed from the included stuff sack.

The baffles vary in width from a tight 5&quot; to an even tighter 4.5&quot;, and are corner-blocked to prevent the down shifting that can occur with continuous baffles.  While I cannot deliberately shift down for greater temperature range as in a continuous-baffle bag, I gain by having a warm back when turning with the bag and no cold spots on top in the really cold nights I commonly encounter, even in mid-June.  The bag drapes well and edge-seals nicely for use as a quilt in warmer weather and is comfortable as a quilt on 62F nights, making it effectively as useful as if I could shift the down.  

Best of all, it weighs in at 3.0 pounds exactly on my precision scale, and cost $309, making it a tremendous value in a light cold-weather bag.  Compared to my $269 Marmot Never Summer 0F bag, the Halo has 750-fill down (vs. 600-fill), with a 90/10 down cluster/feather ratio (vs. 80/20) and has a much thinner shell.  To match the Women&#039;s Halo +10&#039;s male EN rating in a Marmot bag would require a Lithium 0 at $459 or a Mountain Hardwear Phantom 0 at $475 -- and neither of those bags have corner-blocked baffles like the REI.

If I sound enthusiastic about this bag it is because I am.  I went through a number of bags looking for the right one for my needs before stumbling on the idea of looking at a women&#039;s bag with an appropriate male EN lower limit.  The only drawback is the women&#039;s *long* Halo +10 is only available in a right zip.  In the last 20 years, there has been a move toward left-zips in both bags and tents and left-zips are convenient if you are right-handed.  REI advises me there are no plans to produce the women&#039;s long Halo +10 in a left-zip, so I guess I will have to continue to pile into it from the wrong side when entering my left-doored solo tent.  Ah, well...a small price to pay when everything on the bag -- including the zipper! -- is &quot;right&quot;. 

-- Danneaux.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate your test, David, and it was a factor in my decision &#8212; as a man &#8212; to buy the REI women&#8217;s long Halo +10 bag.  Why?  I am a solo adventure cyclist who takes trips through alpine passes to high-altitude &#8220;cold&#8221; deserts like the Great Basin during shoulder seasons, and it is common to experience temps in the single digits (F) at night and find it well over 100F by day&#8217;s end.  Because of this, I needed a good, warm, cold-weather bag that was as light as possible and easy on the budget while packing reasonably small.  </p>
<p>The REI Women&#8217;s Long Halo +10 fits my 5&#8217;11&#8243;, 165lb. frame perfectly, and I appreciate the extra warmth included in the hood, foot area, and chest compared to the men&#8217;s version, which is not nearly as warm (the men&#8217;s Halo +10 is EN 13537 rated at +12F for the men&#8217;s lower limit, while the women&#8217;s +10 is rated at +1F for men).  I am not overweight, so the 58&#8243;/58&#8243; shoulder/hip dimensions make for a tight column and practical performance fit I can heat without feeling pinched.  The men&#8217;s was wider than I wanted to heat at the shoulders (59&#8243;) and tighter in the hips (55&#8243;), which inhibited easy turnover in the bag when wearing extra layers.  My bag may not be typical, but measures out repeatedly at 4.5&#8243; of top loft and 3.75&#8243; of bottom loft after sitting for an hour after it has been removed from the included stuff sack.</p>
<p>The baffles vary in width from a tight 5&#8243; to an even tighter 4.5&#8243;, and are corner-blocked to prevent the down shifting that can occur with continuous baffles.  While I cannot deliberately shift down for greater temperature range as in a continuous-baffle bag, I gain by having a warm back when turning with the bag and no cold spots on top in the really cold nights I commonly encounter, even in mid-June.  The bag drapes well and edge-seals nicely for use as a quilt in warmer weather and is comfortable as a quilt on 62F nights, making it effectively as useful as if I could shift the down.  </p>
<p>Best of all, it weighs in at 3.0 pounds exactly on my precision scale, and cost $309, making it a tremendous value in a light cold-weather bag.  Compared to my $269 Marmot Never Summer 0F bag, the Halo has 750-fill down (vs. 600-fill), with a 90/10 down cluster/feather ratio (vs. 80/20) and has a much thinner shell.  To match the Women&#8217;s Halo +10&#8242;s male EN rating in a Marmot bag would require a Lithium 0 at $459 or a Mountain Hardwear Phantom 0 at $475 &#8212; and neither of those bags have corner-blocked baffles like the REI.</p>
<p>If I sound enthusiastic about this bag it is because I am.  I went through a number of bags looking for the right one for my needs before stumbling on the idea of looking at a women&#8217;s bag with an appropriate male EN lower limit.  The only drawback is the women&#8217;s *long* Halo +10 is only available in a right zip.  In the last 20 years, there has been a move toward left-zips in both bags and tents and left-zips are convenient if you are right-handed.  REI advises me there are no plans to produce the women&#8217;s long Halo +10 in a left-zip, so I guess I will have to continue to pile into it from the wrong side when entering my left-doored solo tent.  Ah, well&#8230;a small price to pay when everything on the bag &#8212; including the zipper! &#8212; is &#8220;right&#8221;. </p>
<p>&#8211; Danneaux.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.easternslopes.com @ 2012-02-11 18:43:58 -->
