Everything balloons in winter, weighs more, takes up more space.
You need a larger tent in winter for more living space and to keep more of your gear inside, and a sturdier tent to handle snowload. A typical winter tent is a couple of pounds heavier than its summer counterparts
You also need a thicker, warmer (and heavier, bulkier) sleeping bag and pad to insulate you from the cold. Ditto with clothes: they get bulkier and heavier in winter.
Winter also means carrying more food, a heavier stove and more fuel, and a larger pot to melt snow and heat water. You also need a shovel to create a level spot for your tent, and a light for the long dark evenings.
Then there are skis or snowshoes and poles, creepers or crampons for hard crust and ice, an ice axe if that hard snow or ice is tilted . . .
It all adds up.
Once you’ve assembled all this stuff, you need to haul it to your campsite.
Snowmobiles are cheating, so that leaves just three viable choices: Option one is a backpack big enough to load all your gear in or onto. Option two is a pulk, which is a sled with a rigid pulling harness that attaches to you via a waist belt. The rigid harness keeps the sled from banging into you when you’re going downhill. The theory behind a pulk is that you don’t have to carry the weight, it just slides along behind you.
The third option is both a pack and a pulk.
Any of these options CAN work, depending on your own abilities and the terrain you are traveling on. (And all of them ARE work. . . . )
In winter, big packs are better; it’s easier to fit in all that bulky winter gear. My opinion: winter backpacks start at 6,000-plus cubic inches (for men, women’s packs aren’t made that big—more proof that women are smarter than men). But you are always limited by the amount of weight you can carry.
In theory, the pulk just sliding along behind you sounds wonderful. In practice, pulks work very well on smooth flats and slight downhills, especially if the load is light, not so well up or down steeper hills and side-hills.
Pulk pulling can get pretty complicated threading your way through tight trees, around blowdowns, and crossing brooks and steep-sided gullies. On side hills, where the pulk wants to slide downhill of the puller, pulk pulling can be a real pain. Here in the northeast you can encounter all of those challenges within a matter of feet on any given trail.
Still, if you are going out for an extended trip, or packing extra goodies on a short trail like four of us did recently on our Black Mountain Cabin adventure, the pack-and-pulk combination can be sterling.
I’m still experimenting, trying to decide whether it’s better to put heavier stuff in the pulk or fill the pulk with light-but bulky stuff like sleeping bags (which take up an awful lot of room in the pack. There may not be any one right answer: it depends on the terrain, the pulk and the puller.
Still, there’s no real “wrong” way to do it, and experimenting with a pulk is one more excuse to get out and have a good time in the winter. Life isn’t a spectator sport. Get out and enjoy!
Pick A BIG Pack
A big backpack is a big investment that you live with for a long time. For the last 20 years, I used a 6,200 cu. in Mountainsmith, that can carry about 65 pounds before it gets uncomfortable. I recently acquired an Osprey Argon 110 (113 liters, 6900 cu. in.) as a replacement. Kelty also makes the giant Red Cloud which is less expensive.
Even unloaded, this Osprey pack is impressive, both the suspension system and bag are both thoughtfully designed with lots of attention paid to details and quality construction. And it’s lighter than some other packs this size
Being the gearheads we are, my trail buddy and easternSlopes.com Publisher David Shedd and I recently decided to see how much weight we could carry in the Argon 110 before it got seriously uncomfortable.
We still don’t have an answer. We’ve overloaded it with ridiculous weights: 80-plus pounds for me, 90-plus pounds for David, and we both had exactly the same reaction: No matter how heavy we load it, the pack itself never gets uncomfortable—it just gets too heavy to carry.
I can easily see using the Argon 110 to do a week-long winter trip (or a two-week summer trip) without re-supply. And if it will carry 80 pounds comfortably, imagine how comfortable it would be with a more-normal load? Great piece of equipment!
You have two choices in pulks: make one yourself, or buy ready-made. I’ve tried both and, so far, the ready-made ones outperform the DIY. But the price difference is enormous.
For DIY designs, go to www.skipulk.com, or just Google “pulk” (which will also get you reviews of ready-made designs. Incidentally, most ready-made pulks have child-seat adapters to take little ones cross-country skiing (there’s a review of several at www.xcskiworld.com).
On our Black Mountain trek we used a homemade PVC pipe harness for a Mad River Rocket. The pulk directions from their website are not perfect, and the rig we concocted still needs work, but I had the sled, the harness was cheap, and it worked pretty well.
I’ve been testing a Nordic Cab pulk from Norway. Essentially a box on fat skis (or wheels in the summer) with a really nice cargo bag included, it pulls beautifully on both groomed and ungroomed trails.
Winter camping gear has gotten smaller and lighter, but it still isn’t small or light. For comfort in winter, you are going to need some serious hauling capacity. A big pack can go almost anywhere, but every pound is always on your back.
A pulk gives you more hauling capacity on moderate terrain but can be more trouble than it’s worth when the going gets steep or rough. It will also slow you down if your goal is traveling fast. Still, there are times when a loaded pulk slides along behind you so effortlessly you hardly know it’s there, and you wonder why you would ever us a backpack . . .
There’s no one perfect answer.